Current Colour Trends...
Neutrals are still very much with us and seem to be going in a couple of directions, away from or in addition to the beige on beige tonalities, which are still very popular. And there's a reason for this. Neutrals are comfortable to live in, make a great backdrop for adding color or artwork, and can be updated and changed easily. But neutrals are also evolving into much stronger versions - rich browns, ochres, deeper colors, all creating more of a statement. There's both a rustic and a sophisticated feel to this palette. On the other hand, we're also seeing white-white on white-white, sometimes in conjunction with strong colors, or with black for an update on that classic combination. 
Retro - as now, not then - is very strong, not only in styles, but in colors. A lot of very real, very bright colors are showing up - lime to pea greens, oranges in various hues, electric blues, true reds, pinks from soft to shocking, and yellows. Sometimes these are used sparingly as accents, sometimes they're used all together, and sometimes they're seen on a background of white or black. Or it might be a particular combination of colors - such as brown with icy blues - that feels retro, but retro as now, not then.
Warm to hot colors - reds, reds, on top of pinks, pinks - lots of pinks, on top of oranges, with yellows. It's an exciting palette, which can be used in a muted or very bold way. When muted and not using the "retro as now" versions, this palette can be very earthy and almost reassuring. It has a feel of fall colors, which almost everyone responds to in a deeply satisfying way. When bold, it's very now, and very striking and definitely not serene.
Serenity colors - anything that evokes a zen, meditative, soothing feeling - have been here for a while and seem to be staying. This scheme can be done with various versions of colors, but more often you'll see soft cool tones, such as pale aquas, steely blues, soft sages, beiges..... used together or separately. But these cool tones can be used with warmer, still soft, tones very pleasingly too. One of the hallmarks of this color scheme is that it's fairly monochromatic and low contrast - that's what makes it so soothing and easy to live with.
article from http://designerspeak.com/color-trends.html
A WORD ABOUT THE PRICE...
Many contractors today try to stay competitive by giving a "lowball" qoute, in order to make a profit, they will take shortcuts such as low quality materials,cutting corners on the project, and trying to cut their labour cost by rushing the job. I have taken the time to know what my cost,overhead, and profit needs to be. A low bid job that ends up bad isn't worth any price you happened to pay, is it? My price is truly competetive. That is to say, my markup includes cost,overhead, and profit. In exchange for that you the customer gets a quality job.
You simply cannot do a quality job, with quality matierials and not charge a fair price. There are reasons why a contractors get a bad reputation in general. They underbid jobs, do bad work, and customers spread the word. They show up late on the job, often don't start the job when scheaduled, and dont finish on time. In recap: A contractor has to make a profit to stay in business, we are just like any other service out there. We are craftsman, just like any other trade. A "Low Price" is a RED FLAG.
Poor quality work isn't WORTH OF DIME.
I am not a "lowball" contractor but I am FAIRLY PRICE, and I do GOOD AND QUALITY WORK.
What I offer is quality work done in a timely manner...value for YOUR MONEY
House Decoration ( PART 1 )
Reprinted from Essays and Lectures by Oscar Wilde, London: Methuen and Co., 1908.
A lecture delivered in America during Wilde's tour in 1882. It was announced as a lecture on 'The Practical Application of the Principles of the Aesthetic Theory to Exterior and Interior House Decoration, With Observations upon Dress and Personal Ornaments.' The earliest date on which it is known to have been given is May 11, 1882.
IN my last lecture I gave you something of the history of Art in England. I sought to trace the influence of the French Revolution upon its development. I said something of the song of Keats and the school of the pre-Raphaelites. But I do not want to shelter the movement, which I have called the English Renaissance, under any palladium however noble, or any name however revered. The roots of it have, indeed, to be sought for in things that have long passed away, and not, as some suppose, in the fancy of a few young men -- although I am not altogether sure that there is anything much better than the fancy of a few young men.
When I appeared before you on a previous occasion, I had seen nothing of American art save the Doric columns and Corinthian chimney-pots visible on your Broadway and Fifth Avenue. Since then, I have been through your country to some fifty or sixty different cities, I think. I find that what your people need is not so much high imaginative art but that which hallows the vessels of everyday use. I suppose that the poet will sing and the artist will paint regardless whether the world praises or blames. He has his own world and is independent of his fellow-men. But the handicraftsman is de pendent on your pleasure and opinion. He needs your encouragement and he must hare beautiful surroundings. Your people love art but do not sufficiently honour the handicrafts-man. Of course, those millionaires who can pillage Europe for their pleasure need have no care to encourage such; but I speak for those whose desire for beautiful things is larger than their means. I find that one great trouble all over is that your workmen are not given to noble designs. You cannot be indifferent to this, because Art is not something which you can take or leave. It is a necessity of human life.
And what is the meaning of this beautiful decoration which we call art? In the first place, it means value to the workman and it means the pleasure which he most necessarily take in making a beautiful thing. The mark of all good art is not that the thing done is done exactly or finely, for machinery may do as much, but that it is worked out with the head and the workman's heart. I cannot impress the point too frequently that beautiful and rational designs are necessary in all work. I did not imagine, until I went into some of your simpler cities, that there was so much bad work done. I found, where I went, bad wall-papers horribly designed, and coloured carpets, and that old offender the horse-hair sofa, whose stolid look of indifference is always so depressing. I found meaningless chandeliers and machine-made furniture, generally of rosewood, which creaked dismally under the weight of the ubiquitous interviewer. I came across the small iron stone which they always persist in decorating with machine-made ornaments, and which is as great a bore as a wet day or any other particularly dreadful institution. When unusual extravagance was indulged in, it was garnished with two funeral urns.
It must always be remembered that what is well and carefully made by an honest workman, after a rational design, increases in beauty and value as the years go on. The old furniture brought over by the Pilgrims, two hundred years ago, which I saw in New England, is just as good and as beautiful to-day as it was when it first came here. Now, what you must do is to bring artists and handicraftsmen together. Handicraftsmen cannot live, certainly cannot thrive, without such companionship. Separate these two and you rob art of all spiritual motive.
Having done this, you must place your work. man in the midst of beautiful surroundings. The artist is not dependent on the visible and the tangible. He has his visions and his dreams to feed on. But the workman must see lovely forms as he goes to his work in the morning and returns at eventide. And, in connection with this, I want to assure you that noble and beautiful designs are never the result of idle fancy or purposeless day-dreaming. They come only as the accumulation of habits of long and delightful observation. And yet such things may not be taught. Right ideas concerning them can certainly be obtained only by those who have been accustomed to rooms that are beautiful and colours that are satisfying.
Perhaps one of the most difficult things for us to do is to choose a notable and joyous dress for men. There would be more joy in life if we were to accustom ourselves to use all the beautiful colours we can in fashioning our own clothes. The dress of the future, I think, will use drapery to a great extent and will abound with joyous colour. At present we have lost all nobility of dress and, in doing so, have almost annihilated the modern sculptor. And, in looking around at the figures which adorn our parks, one could almost wish that we had completely killed the noble art. To see the frock-coat of the drawing-room done in bronze, or the double waistcoat perpetuated in marble, adds a new horror to death. But indeed, in looking through the history of costume, seeking an answer to the questions we have propounded, there is little that is either beautiful or appropriate. One of the earliest forms is the Greek drapery which is exquisite for young girls. And then, I think we may be pardoned a little enthusiasm over the dress of the time of Charles I., so beautiful indeed, that in spite of its invention being with the Cavaliers it was copied by the Puritans. And the dress for the children of that time must not be passed over. It was a very golden age of the little ones. I do not think that they have ever looked so lovely as they do in the pictures of that time. The dress of the last century in England is also peculiarly gracious and graceful. There is nothing bizarre or strange about it, but it is full of harmony and beauty. In these days,, when we have suffered dreadfully from the incursions of the modern milliner, we hear ladies boast that they do not wear a dress more than once. In the old days, when the dresses were decorated with beautiful designs and worked with exquisite embroidery, ladies rather took a pride in bringing out the garment and wearing it many times and handing it down to their daughters--a process that would, I think, be quite appreciated by a modern husband when called upon to settle his wife's bills.
And how shall men dress? Men say that they do not particularly care how they dress, and that it is little matter. I am bound to reply that I do not think that you do. In all my journeys through the country, the only well-dressed men that I saw - and in saying this I earnestly deprecate the polished indignation of your Fifth Avenue dandies--were the Western miners. Their wide-brimmed hats, which shaded their faces from the sun and protected them from the rain, and the cloak, which is by far the most beautiful piece of drapery ever invented, may well be dwelt on with admiration. Their high boots, too, were sensible and practical. They wore only what was comfortable, and therefore beautiful. As I looked at them I could not help thinking with regret of the time when these picturesque miners would have made their fortunes and would go East to assume again all tile abominations of modern fashionable attire. Indeed, so concerned was I that 1 made some of them promise that when they again appeared in the more crowded scenes of Eastern civilisation they would still continue to wear their lovely costume. But I do not believe they will.
Now, what America wants to-day is a school of rational art. Bad art is a great deal worse than no art at all. You must show your workmen specimens of good work so that they come to know what is simple and true and beautiful. To that end I would have you have a museum attached to these schools--not one of those dreadful modern institutions where there is a stuffed and very dusty giraffe, and a case or two of fossils, but a place where there are gathered examples of art decoration from various periods and countries. Such a place is the South Kensington Museum in London, whereon we build greater hopes for the future than on any other one thing. There I go every Saturday night, when the museum is open later than usual, to see the handicraftsman, the wood-worker, the glass-blower and the worker in metals. And it is here that the man of refinement and culture comes face to face with the workman who ministers to his joy. He comes to know more of the nobility of the workman, and the workman, feeling the appreciation, comes to know more of the nobility of his work.
You have too many white walls. More colour is wanted. You should have such men as Whistler among you to teach you the beauty and joy of colour. Take Mr. Whistler's 'Symphony in White,' which you no doubt have imagined to be something quite bizarre. It is nothing of the sort. Think of a cool grey sky flecked here and there with white clouds, a grey ocean and three wonderfully beautiful figures robed in white, leaning over the water and dropping white flowers from their fingers. Here is no extensive intellectual scheme to trouble you, and no metaphysics of which we have had quite enough in art. But if the simple and unaided colour strike the right keynote, the whole conception is made clear. I regard Mr. Whistler's famous Peacock Room as the finest thing in colour and art decoration which the world has known since Correggio painted that wonderful room in Italy where the little children are dancing on the walls. Mr. Whistler finished another room just before I came away--a breakfast room in blue and yellow. The ceiling was a light blue, the cabinet-work and the furniture were of a yellow wood, the curtains at the windows were white and worked in yellow, and when the table was set for breakfast with dainty blue china nothing can be conceived at once so simple and so joyous.
